@pipeworx/nl-rechtspraak
Connect: https://pipeworx.io/mcp — every tool in the catalog, including @pipeworx/nl-rechtspraak’s. Install: one-click buttons
Connect to just the @pipeworx/nl-rechtspraak pack
https://gateway.pipeworx.io/nl-rechtspraak/mcp — only @pipeworx/nl-rechtspraak’s own tools, nothing else in the catalog.
No MCP client? Skip the connection: POST https://gateway.pipeworx.io/v1/tools/search_packs {"query":"..."} to find a tool below, GET /v1/tools/<name> for its schema, POST the same URL with arguments for the data — see For AI agents.
Tools: 2
Dutch court decisions (uitspraken en conclusies): search by court, legal
domain and decision date, resolve by ECLI, and read the full original Dutch
text. Separate from @pipeworx/nl-wetten, which covers statutes — this pack
is case law.
Tools
nl_rechtspraak_search(query?, court?, subject?, type?, date_from?, date_to?, offset?, limit?)— search Dutch court decisions by court, legal domain (rechtsgebied), document type and decision-date range, paged.queryis a client-side substring match against each candidate’s title and published abstract (summary) only — the source has no full-text search API — scanned across at most 200 of the most recently modified metadata-matching candidates; the response says plainly when that scan was partial. Returns ECLIs thatnl_rechtspraak_get_decisionresolves to the full text.nl_rechtspraak_get_decision(ecli)— one decision’s full original Dutch text, court, decision date, publication date and last-modified date as three separate fields, procedure, rechtsgebied(en), formal relations to other ECLIs (e.g. the earlier instance this is an appeal of), and any BWB statute ids the source formally links (cited_bwb_ids— often empty; see Notes) for chaining tonl_wetten_get_law/nl_wetten_get_article.
Auth
Keyless.
Data sources
- Raad voor de Rechtspraak, Open Data van de Rechtspraak — every Dutch court decision that has been assigned an ECLI (European Case Law Identifier), with its full text where published.
Notes
- Search is metadata, not full-text. The source’s search service filters
by court, legal domain, document type and date — confirmed by probing
several candidate free-text parameter names against it; none changed the
result count.
queryis Pipeworx’s own client-side filter over the title and published abstract of the metadata-matching candidates, not a search of the complete decision body. A term that only appears deep in the court’s reasoning will not match. - Three dates, never collapsed:
decision_date(uitspraakdatum — when the court decided),publication_date(issued — when rechtspraak.nl published it, which can be years later or never for older cases) andlast_modified(the record’s own last metadata/text change) are three separate fields in the source and three separate fields here. - BWB statute citations are rarely structured. The source schema has a
documented field for linking a decision to the specific law it cites
(
dcterms:references, with abwb:identifier prefix), but sampling recent Hoge Raad decisions found it populated in none of them — courts cite legislation by name in the prose, not as a machine-linked identifier.cited_bwb_idsreads that field when present and falls back to scanning the raw document for a literal BWB id string; an empty result means the source did not formally link a statute, not that the decision cites none. Look the law up by name withnl_wetten_searchinstead, then chain tonl_wetten_get_article. courtandsubjecttake a name or the exact source identifier URI. The underlying API only accepts the full OWMS/PSI identifier URI for both parameters — “Hoge Raad” alone is rejected by the upstream. This pack resolves the ~26 currently sitting Dutch courts and the full rechtsgebied taxonomy by name (e.g. “HR”, “Rechtbank Amsterdam”, “Civiel recht”, “Arbeidsrecht”); a discontinued court (of the 261 the source has ever issued decisions under) still works if you pass its identifier URI directly.- Search titles come back from the source as one fixed-shape string
(
ECLI, court, DD-MM-YYYY, case number(s)); this pack parses court, date and case number out of it into separate fields. The rare entry that doesn’t match that shape comes back withtitle_parsed: falseand the raw title only — never a silently wrong date.
Tools
- nl_rechtspraak_search — Search Dutch court decisions (uitspraken/conclusies) by court, legal domain (rechtsgebied), document type and decision-date range, paged. The source has no full-text search API; passing
queryfilter - nl_rechtspraak_get_decision — Read one Dutch court decision by its ECLI (e.g. “ECLI:NL:HR:2019:2006”): full original Dutch text, court, decision date, publication date and last-modified date as separate fields, procedure, rechtsge
Tools
nl_rechtspraak_get_decision— Read one Dutch court decision by its ECLI (e.g. ECLI:NL:HR:2019:2006 ): full original Dutch text, court, decision date, publication date and last-modified date as separate fields, procedure, rechtsgebnl_rechtspraak_search— Search Dutch court decisions (uitspraken/conclusies) by court, legal domain (rechtsgebied), document type and decision-date range, paged. The source has no full-text search API; passing `query` filter