@pipeworx/insurance-denials
Connect: https://gateway.pipeworx.io/insurance-denials/mcp · Install: one-click buttons
Tools: 4
US health-insurance claim denial rates and appeal outcomes, per insurer — which companies deny the most claims, and whether appealing one actually works.
Tools
| Tool | Answers |
|---|---|
insurer_denial_rates | Which insurers deny the most claims, ranked by in-network denial rate. Filter by state and market. |
insurer_appeal_outcomes | What share of appeals get overturned in the patient’s favour, internal and external. |
insurer_denial_profile | Everything reported for one named insurer, forgiving about how the name is written. |
insurer_denial_coverage | What is in scope — plan year, issuer and state counts, and how much CMS suppressed. |
Auth
None. No key, no account.
Data sources
The CMS Transparency in Coverage Public Use File, plan year 2026, published by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services:
- Landing page: https://www.cms.gov/marketplace/resources/data/public-use-files
- File: https://download.cms.gov/marketplace-puf/2026/transparency-in-coverage-puf.zip
Issuers report these figures to CMS themselves under 45 CFR 156.220. CMS publishes the file once a year, as an XLSX inside a ZIP.
What this covers, and what it does not
Two limits, both easy to mistake for a data bug:
HealthCare.gov states only — 30 of them. An issuer on a state-run exchange
(California, New York, Massachusetts, Washington, Colorado, Pennsylvania, New
Jersey and others) reports to that state, not into this federal file. A caller
asking about California gets an explicit state_not_in_source refusal naming
the reason, rather than an empty list that would read as “California insurers
deny nothing”.
Self-reported. These are the issuers’ own counts, and CMS says so in the file’s own disclaimer. They are not an audit.
Reading the numbers
- Dental denies far more than medical. Standalone dental plans
(
Individual SADP) sit at the top of any unfiltered denial ranking — several above 70%. Passmarket: "medical"when the question is about medical cover, or the answer will be true and misleading. - Suppressed is not zero. CMS marks a figure it cannot publish with
*or**. Those arenullhere, never0— a suppressed denial count reported as zero would describe a perfect insurer. - Internal and external appeals differ. Internal appeals are decided by the insurer that issued the denial; external appeals go to an independent reviewer. The external number is the arm’s-length one.
- One filing per state. A multi-state insurer reports separately in each
state, so
insurer_denial_profilereturns one entry per state rather than a single national figure.
Refreshing
Annual, when CMS publishes the next plan year:
node scripts/refresh-insurance-denials.mjs # rewrites src/data.json
The script re-reads the CMS file and rolls it up to issuer level. It dedupes
by issuer id and never sums: the Issuer_* columns repeat identically on
every plan row an issuer has, so summing multiplies each figure by that
issuer’s plan count. Verified when the pack was built — 0 of 185 issuer ids
varied across their own rows.
Tools
- insurer_denial_rates — Which health insurers deny the most claims — US marketplace issuers ranked by the share of in-network claims they denied, for plan year ${PLAN_YEAR}. Answers “what percentage of claims does my insuran
- insurer_appeal_outcomes — Does appealing a denied health-insurance claim work? Marketplace issuers ranked by the share of appeals that were OVERTURNED in the patient’s favour, plan year ${PLAN_YEAR}. Answers “is it worth appea
- insurer_denial_profile — Everything reported for ONE named health insurer: claims received and denied in and out of network, the denial rate, and both internal and external appeal outcomes, for plan year ${PLAN_YEAR}. Use whe
- insurer_denial_coverage — What this data covers before you rely on it: the plan year, how many issuers and states are present, which states are included, and the counts of issuers whose denial or appeal figures CMS suppressed.
Tools
-
insurer_appeal_outcomes— Does appealing a denied health-insurance claim work? Marketplace issuers ranked by the share of appeals that were OVERTURNED in the patient's favour, plan year ${PLAN_YEAR}. Answers is it worth appeal -
insurer_denial_coverage— What this data covers before you rely on it: the plan year, how many issuers and states are present, which states are included, and the counts of issuers whose denial or appeal figures CMS suppressed. -
insurer_denial_profile— Everything reported for ONE named health insurer: claims received and denied in and out of network, the denial rate, and both internal and external appeal outcomes, for plan year ${PLAN_YEAR}. Use whe -
insurer_denial_rates— Which health insurers deny the most claims — US marketplace issuers ranked by the share of in-network claims they denied, for plan year ${PLAN_YEAR}. Answers what percentage of claims does my insuranc